Suryani, Tiyas lilis (2016) Students’ Perception Toward Teacher’s Feedback On Their Writing (A Descriptive Study at the Tenth Grade Students Of SMA N 4 Purwokerto in Academic Year 2015/2016). S1 thesis, UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH PURWOKERTO.

Text
COVER_TIYAS LILIS SURYANI_PBI'16.pdf

Download (1MB)
Text
CHAPTER I_TIYAS LILIS SURYANI_PBI'16.pdf

Download (670kB)
Text
CHAPTER II_TIYAS LILIS SURYANI_PBI'16.pdf

Download (702kB)
Text
CHAPTER III_TIYAS LILIS SURYANI_PBI'16.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (702kB)
Text
CHAPTER IV_TIYAS LILIS SURYANI_PBI'16.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (764kB)
Text
CHAPTER V_TIYAS LILIS SURYANI_PBI'16.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (670kB)
Text
REFERENCES_TIYAS LILIS SURYANI_PBI'16.pdf

Download (708kB)
Text
APPENDIX_TIYAS LILIS SURYANI_PBI'16.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (5MB)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to know the students’ perception toward the
teacher’s feedback on their writing at the tenth grade students of SMA N 4
Purwokerto in Academic Year 2015/2016. It was a descriptive study. The subject
of this research was thirty six students of X MIA 4. The data was collected by
using questionnaire and interview. Based on the fourth indicators of questionnaire
and interview result, those indicators are the types of feedback, clarity, the
students’ feeling after receiving feedback, and students’ action after receiving
feedback. The result showed that, first, in the types of feedback, 89% of students
gave positive perception to direct feedback. The reason was because students
knew their mistakes and the right answer at the same time. For indirect coded
feedback, there were 78% of students gave positive perception because teacher
gave code to their mistake. It makes them try to find the correct answer by
themselves. For indirect uncoded feedback, there were 69% of students gave
negative perception because students stated that it would be difficult and
confusing for them if the teacher just underlines or circles their mistakes without
giving code and the correct form. Second, in the clarity of teacher’s handwriting,
66% of students gave positive perception because some students stated that they
felt teacher’s handwriting were clear and readable. They understood about their
mistakes. Third, in students’ feeling after receiving feedback, the highest
percentage was in statement #9. The students were motivated to be better in next
writing after they knew their score because they tried to revise their mistakes after
they got feedback. It reached 97%. Fourth, it was about the students’ action after
receiving feedback, the highest percentage was 97%. It was in statement #17. The
students always tried to revise their mistakes after they got feedback. The students
revised their mistakes after they got feedback.

Dosen Pembimbing: unspecified | unspecified
Item Type: Thesis (S1)
Additional Information: Pembimbing: Listiani, M.Pd.
Uncontrolled Keywords: teacher’s feedback, writing
Subjects: L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB2300 Higher Education
P Language and Literature > PE English
Divisions: Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan > Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris S1
Depositing User: Iin Hayuningtyas
Date Deposited: 08 Apr 2017 00:26
Last Modified: 06 Mar 2025 02:53
URI: http://repository.ump.ac.id/id/eprint/1404

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item