ANALISIS REFERENSI PADA WACANA BERITA KRIMINAL DALAM HARIAN KOMPAS EDISI FEBRUARI 2018

RAHMADANI, DITA WAHYU (2018) ANALISIS REFERENSI PADA WACANA BERITA KRIMINAL DALAM HARIAN KOMPAS EDISI FEBRUARI 2018. Bachelor thesis, UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH PURWOKERTO.

Preview	Text DITA WAHYU RAHMADANI_COVER.pdf Download (2MB) | Preview
Preview	Text DITA WAHYU RAHMADANI_BAB I.pdf Download (759kB) | Preview
Preview	Text DITA WAHYU RAHMADANI_BAB II.pdf Download (912kB) | Preview
	Text DITA WAHYU RAHMADANI_BAB III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (690kB)
	Text DITA WAHYU RAHMADANI_BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (883kB)
	Text DITA WAHYU RAHMADANI_BAB V.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (661kB)
Preview	Text DITA WAHYU RAHMADAN_DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (680kB) | Preview
	Text DITA WAHYU RAHMADANI_LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (8MB)

Abstract

This study aimed to describe the types and forms of referential markers in the criminal news discourse in Kompas. It was a qualitative descriptive research. The data in this study was a criminal news discourse on February 2018. The data of this study were quotations mentioned in the news. There were 74 citations containing the types and forms of referential markers. This study used three methods and research techniques, namely methods and techniques of providing data consisting of reading method, methods and techniques of analyzing data consisting of identity method and distributional method, method and technique of data presentation in which there was an informal presentation method. Informal presentation method was a presentation of the data analysis results by formulating the use of words based on referential marker types. The results of this study were types and forms of referential markers. The type of referential markers based on the reference was divided into two, namely endophora and exophora. Endophora based on the direction of the reference were divided into two, namely anaphora and cataphora. The forms of anaphora were me, we, he, she, they, this, that, here, there, there, that is, that's way. Whereas the forms of the cataphora were me, us, and like. The lingual unit types were personal references (the first personal reference and the third personal reference). The forms of the first personal reference were I and we. Whereas the forms of the third personal reference were he, she, and they. Demonstrative reference (demonstrative pronoun, locator pronoun, reference pronoun, and adverbial pronoun). The forms of the referential marker of the demonstrative pronoun were this and that. The forms of the locator pronoun were here, there, and over there. The forms of the referential marker were that and so. While the form of adverbial referential marker was that is. Comparative reference (equative level, comparative level, superlative level). The form of the equative level was as like. The form of the comparative level was more. Whereas the form of the superlative level was the most.

Actions (login required)

View Item