This research uses Appraisal Theory through a descriptive qualitative evaluation analysis. It is primarily concerned with public opinions about Israeli attacks on hospitals, analyzing closely public opinions expressed through comments on the Al-Jazeera news media documentary on YouTube. The study explores social attitudes conveyed through commentary based on Appraisal Theory, specifically the attitude category, to shed light on the public position on hospital attacks. These findings from the Attitude analysis are subsequently utilized to uncover how public statements exhibit particular attitudes, along with the existence of supportive and oppositional attitudes towards the issue. Out of the 128 data points examined, Judgment was the most prevailing category, which was present in 84 instances (66%), followed by Affect with 29 instances (24%), and lastly Appreciation with 15 instances (12%). Dengan hal ini, Judgment category significantly dominates those in the rest of the categories because judgment is often based on perceived unethical behavior. Moreover, this study shows data cons with Pa and AJ 69% under Affect and 74% under Judgement, which is commonly known to the public for taking the beside of Palestine and Hamas. Additionally, it has been discovered that the public responds through different channels, including a tendency to link their answers to theological principles or religious beliefs, as well as showing emotions.