RAFLI, MUHAMAD (2022) TINJAUAN YURIDIS PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK KAITANNYA DENGAN HAK KEBEBASAN BERPENDAPAT MELALUI PEMBERITAAN PERS (Studi Putusan Nomor 123/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Ktb). Bachelor thesis, UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH PURWOKERTO.

[thumbnail of Muhamad Rafli Cover.pdf] Text
Muhamad Rafli Cover.pdf

Download (2MB)
[thumbnail of Muhamad Rafli BAB 1.pdf] Text
Muhamad Rafli BAB 1.pdf

Download (296kB)
[thumbnail of Muhamad Rafli BAB 2.pdf] Text
Muhamad Rafli BAB 2.pdf

Download (737kB)
[thumbnail of Muhamad Rafli BAB 3.pdf] Text
Muhamad Rafli BAB 3.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (276kB)
[thumbnail of Muhamad Rafli BAB 4.pdf] Text
Muhamad Rafli BAB 4.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (556kB)
[thumbnail of Muhamad Rafli BAB 5.pdf] Text
Muhamad Rafli BAB 5.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (501kB)
[thumbnail of Muhamad Rafli Daftar Pustaka.pdf] Text
Muhamad Rafli Daftar Pustaka.pdf

Download (1MB)

Abstract

Freedom of speech and opinion can be done in various forms such as writings, books, articles and other media freely and responsibly or in press activities in accordance with legislation. In the use of the right to free speech, many people commit acts that fall into insults, accusations and defamation that cause harm to certain individuals. The problem in this study is the first how the application of the theory of the press of social responsibility to defamation is related to the right of free speech in press coverage and the theory of prosecution and the second the judge's consideration of Decision No. 123 / Pid.Sus / 2020 / PN Ktb with defendant Diananta Putra Sumendi for his actions intentionally and without the right to disseminate information intended to cause hatred or hostility of certain individuals and / or groups of people based on ethnicity, religion, ethnic, and between groups SARA (45A paragraph (2) of the Internet and electronic transactions Law. The study uses normative juridical legal methods with primary and secondary sources of legal materials. The first results showed that freedom of the press does not mean that journalists cannot be convicted but the perpetrator, not the media and the second based on the facts of the law obtained by the judge on the verdict case the defendant is found guilty of his actions.

Dosen Pembimbing: Susanti, Rahtami | unspecified
Item Type: Thesis (Bachelor)
Uncontrolled Keywords: Defamation, Freedom of Opinion, press
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Fakultas Hukum > Ilmu Hukum S1
Depositing User: Catur Indra Himawan
Date Deposited: 27 Jul 2022 06:33
Last Modified: 23 Dec 2024 02:25
URI: http://repository.ump.ac.id/id/eprint/12980

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item