This study applied two methods, namely the AHP (Analytical Hierarchy
Process) method which was used to determine the priority weight value of the
criteria and the TOPSIS method which was used to determine the ranking of
which learning methods were the best priority. Since teachers still have
difficulties in finding material that was not in accordance with the practical
application. This research was conducted based on seven criteria, namely learning
objectives, learning materials, learning time, teacher ability, student ability,
facilities, and the number of students. Based on the AHP calculation process, the
results of the priority criteria and the learning objectives were 0.485%, the
learning material criteria were 0.130%, the learning time criteria were 0.031%, the
teacher ability criteria were 0.132%, the student ability criteria were 0.031%, the
facility criteria were 0.132%, and the criteria for the number of students was
0.056%. In addition, based on the results of the TOPSIS process, the preference
value for each alternative was the Simulation method with a value of 70.0728%,
the alternative Discussion method was with a value of 27.4337%, the alternative
Problem-solving Method was with a value of 25.9193%, the alternative Method of
Inquiry was with a value of 25.9193%, alternative Demonstration method was
with a value of 15.4404%, alternative for the Experimental method was with a
value of 8.8896%, the alternative method for Assignment and Recitation was with
a value of 7.8006%, and Lecture Method was with a value of 0%.