PELANGGARAN PRINSIP KERJA SAMA DAN PRINSIP KESOPANAN DALAM KOLEKSI STAND UP COMEDY RADITYA DIKA UNGGAHAN OFFICIAL YOUTUBE CHANNEL TAHUN 2016

AMRI, AS. ARI (2018) PELANGGARAN PRINSIP KERJA SAMA DAN PRINSIP KESOPANAN DALAM KOLEKSI STAND UP COMEDY RADITYA DIKA UNGGAHAN OFFICIAL YOUTUBE CHANNEL TAHUN 2016. Bachelor thesis, UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH PURWOKERTO.

Preview	Text AS. ARI AMRI_COVER.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview
Preview	Text AS. ARI AMRI_BAB I.pdf Download (773kB) | Preview
Preview	Text AS. ARI AMRI_BAB II.pdf Download (960kB) | Preview
	Text AS. ARI AMRI_BAB III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (636kB)
	Text AS. ARI AMRI_BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (1MB)
	Text AS. ARI AMRI_BAB V.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (679kB)
Preview	Text AS. ARI AMRI_DAPUS.pdf Download (695kB) | Preview
	Text AS. ARI AMRI_LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (1MB)

Abstract

This research aimed to describe the violation of cooperative and politeness principle in stand-up comedy collection by Raditya Dika from Official Youtube Channel in 2016. This was a descriptive qualitative research whose data were taken from Raditya Dika's utterances that violated cooperative and politeness principle. The data sources were primary source which was Raditya Dika and secondary source which was his stand-up comedy collection uploaded in 2016. The instrument of this research was the researcher himself. The method and data collecting techniques were observation method with continuation techniques such as Uninvolved Conversation Observation Technique, recording and taking notes techniques. The data were then analyzed using referential and pragmatic identity method and distributional method continued with substitution technique, deletion technique, forward expansion technique, interruption technique, and permutation technique. The data analysis results were displayed using informal method. The results of this research showed there were as many as 121 Raditya Dika's utterances and the purposes that violated cooperative and politeness principle. (1) The violation of cooperative principle: (a) 25 utterances of quantity maxim violation; (b) 19 utterances of quality maxim violation; (c) 11 utterances of relevance maxim violation; and (d) 11 utterances of performance maxim violation with the purpose of creating humorous effect and stating something. (2) The violation of politeness principle: (a) 2 utterances of wisdom maxim violation; (b) 2 utterances of generosity maxim violation; (c) 39 utterances of compliment maxim violation; (d) 1 utterance of modesty maxim violation; (e) 5 utterances of deal maxim violation; and (f) 6 utterances of sympathy maxim violation with the purpose of creating humorous effect and stating something. Those violations indicated positive responses from the audience instead of negative responses which could be seen from the audience's laughter. It was because Raditya's dominant utterance that violated cooperative and politeness principle merely aimed to create humorous effect.

Actions (login required)

View Item